There's a new review for Saladin Ahmed's 'Throne of the Crescent Moon' below.  I really liked the novel but wished the author had taken a little different approach in describing the city.  That's the spoiler free version of the review, basically. 

I feel a little bad because I always seem to rag on Fantasy novels whenever I review them.  I admit I don't read nearly as much of it as I do regular SF, but it just seems like the genre needs a little shaking up to stay interesting.  There are too many books out there with the same old knights and wizards, on the same old tired quest to find something or other to prevent some kind of something from doing whatever.  I don't want to read about it, and if I did there are plenty of great older novels covering the topic, and doing it better.  That doesn't mean I don't feel bad about constantly bashing Fantasy novels everytime I write a review about them. 

Crescent Moon does a good job of avoiding those same pitfalls.  I kind of compare it to N.K. Jemisin's 'Hundred Thousand Kingdoms' in that it's a Fantasy that isn't built on Western Mythology, avoiding the trap of Tolkein and King Arthur entirely.  Crescent Moon has it's faults, but it's definately not the same old Fantasy novel you've been reading.

I'm still working on on 'Shades of Milk and Honey.'  And I'm afraid I'm not going to write a very good review for that novel either.  Not that it's bad in any way, it's just not my cup of tea.  I kind of compare it to Jo Walton's 'Farthing' in that I can recognize that I'm dealing with a well crafted novel, it's just not one I'm particularly interested in.  I'm getting really tired of giving the novels I review poor marks, I'm starting to feel like I only point out flaws in the novels without giving them points for what they do that's good.  I know my last three or four reviews all had bad things to say and I'm starting to feel like one of those jerk reviewers who thumbs his nose at everything.

I think I'm just going to have to dig a little deeper into the list of books I have read to find something I can't say anything bad about.  It's not that hard to find one, 'Gateway,' 'Neuromancer,' 'Invisible Cities,' anything written by Ursula K. Leguin.  I think I'm just going to have to pick something great and hope I can do it justice in a review.  When I set out to do this I was hoping to do a lot more comparison between books, pointing out what something might have been the precursor of, or to, and a lot less pointing out flaws or bashing on poor writing.  That's just life I guess, I'll pick something older to review next.

2013 Hugo and Nebula Award Nominee- 'Throne of the Crescent Moon' by Saladin Ahmed



I bought this as an e-book so this is
the first I've seen of this cover.



There seems to have been a minor trend in Fantasy novels over the last decade or so to branch out from the mythology of Western Culture to more Eastern, African, or Middle Eastern Mythologies.  Which is none too soon as far as I'm concerned, I went over this a little in my review of N.K. Jemisin's 'Hundred Thousand Kingdoms,' but if I read another book with Knights and Wizards and epic quests that doesn't bring something new to the table and just retreads the same tired old story I think I'm going to throw up.  I understand that everything is new to everybody at some point, but there's no need to keep retreading the same used up Fantasy tropes over and over again, for people who are interested in that sort of thing there are fantasy novels stretching back to the Thirties that they could dig up and bring to light..  Michael Moorcock was saying the same thing as far back as 1978 in his essay 'Epic Pooh.'

Where Kingdoms took some of the mythology of India and crafted an interesting story 'Throne of the Crescent Moon' deals with the mythology of the Middle East.  It makes for a very interesting setting.  There are some other SF books that deal with Middle Eastern themes, notably Effinger's 'Marid Audran' series and Ian Mcdonald's 'The Dervish House' (though that was set in Turkey).  Both of those novels take place in the future and have a distinct Science Fiction vibe to go along with the Arabian Mythology.  Crescent Moon is the only Fantasy novel I can think of off the top of my head that takes place in an imagined past full of Middle Eastern Mythology.

Ahmed makes good use of that mythology too, drawing much of his subject matter from 'The Thousand and One Nights' but re-purposing it here for a more straightforward package.  Many of the elements within the novel will be vaguely familiar to Western Fantasy readers, the Djinn, Ghuls, Dervishes, and Sheiks are all familiar, but Ahmed puts just the proper amount of spin on the setting and layout to really entertain the reader. 

I can't speak enough about the setting Ahmed lays out here.  The city of Dhamsawaat is an interesting place. and the author obviously has a fully constructed world here.  Whatever other flaws the novel might have, the setting he has constructed more than earn him both the Hugo and Nebula nominations (and possibly the awards, we'll see in a few months).  I'm glad that the people giving out awards at least recognize there's something of an originality problem in Fantasy and they need to encourage more people to branch out more.  There's still a lot of mythology out there that hasn't really been covered, too much for us to still be reading about knights and orcs and dragons.  So whatever other flaws Crescent Moon might have I am totally behind it as far as the nominations go.

If there are any flaws to the novel it is in the characters anyway, not in the setting or the story being told here.  Several reviews have described it as a cross between The Thousand Nights and Dungeons and Dragons.  You can definitely see the influence of D&D in the characterization.  The mix of characters could almost have come out of an old Saturday morning cartoon.  You have basically a Ninja (the Dervish), a girl who can change into a lion, a healer, an all powerful wizard (coupled with a built-in excuse for why he can't use his power to solve every problem), and their leader, a grizzled veteran ready to retire from monster hunting after this one last job.  Except for the powers of the veteran leader who defeats monsters through scripture none of these are powers readers haven't seen before, and there is nothing so exceptional about them as to bowl the reader over.

This only becomes a problem in that we experience the majority of the novel through the eyes of these characters, rather than being led around it by an omniscient narrator.  I was disappointed in Ahmed's choice of third person subjective/limited for narrator.  The characters here are not as interesting as the city of Dhamsawaat and the overall setting of the novel, but we get much less of the city than we do the internal monologue of the various characters. 

It's not often I will fault a writer for spending too much time developing characters, but that seems to be the case here.  As the various characters traversed the city I found myself getting lost as to where they were in the city, and much more curious as to what color the bricks were on the walls or what the place smelled like than the what the characters were thinking about as they walked around.  I would have liked to experience Dhamsawaat in the same manner readers experienced New Crobuzon in Mieville's 'Perdido Street Station' or how readers met Istanbul in McDonald's 'The Dervish House.'  In those two novels the authors realized that it was the setting itself that made the novel special, and placed it at the forefront, the main character in McDonald's 'Dervish House' is not a man, but Istanbul itself, I wish Ahmed had taken the same path in Crescent. I wanted to be fully immersed in Dhamsawaat, and I only got glimpses of it here and there around the (not as interesting) thoughts of the characters.  An omniscient narrator to guide us through the city, spend some time and really flesh out the details would have been nice.

Ahmed plans to write two sequels to the novel, turning this into the first part of a trilogy.  Unless there are some major stylistic changes coming our way I don't expect the author to depart from what he accomplished here and write in a more detailed form.  Rather than complaining about what Ahmed doesn't do I should just be thankful for the great things he actually does, the brief glimpse of the city Dhamsawaat that we are allowed is more than enough to draw the reader in for the rest of the tale.  Ahmed leaves behind those tired Fantasy tropes (they're exhausted really and need a break) and gives the modern reader something new and refreshing. 

Perhaps this review said it best, Saladin Ahmed has given us a new Fantasy novel that 'Bouyantly fails to suck.'  Whether or not the rest of the books in this series receive any nominations I think people are starting to see that Fantasy needs to branch out some more, and even without those nominations I'm probably going to read the sequels too.

It's been too long since I wrote a review, and in the time I've been slacking I've finished off two more books.  'Captain Vorpatril's Alliance' by Lois McMaster Bujold and 'Redshirts: A Novel with Three Codas' by John Scalzi.  I'm always eager to read a new Vorkosigan novel by Bujold, and it's nice that she's willing to branch out and embrace some of her smaller characters, Ivan has always been sort of hanging out in the background so it's nice to see him getting his own novel.  Also I'm really enjoying watching the whole Vorkosigan crew age and grow up, while their adventures might be less exciting than Bujold's first few novels they're certainly more fulfilling.

I didn't think I would enjoy Redshirts as much as I did.  I had a good idea what the story was about, and while I knew it would be a clever take on the subject I did have my worries that it would be something of a one note gag.  This is actually addressed in the novel and afterword and Scalzi did a pretty good job in capturing the reader's interest for the duration of the novel, and he was as entertaining as ever.

Also I finished 'Throne of the Crescent Moon' by Saladin Ahmed.  I should be posting a review for it in the next couple days.  I both really enjoyed this book, and was immensely disappointed at the same time.  I've always been a big fan of fantasy that has it's roots in a mythology not native to Western Culture, it's one of the reasons I've enjoyed so much of N.K. Jemisin's Inheritance trilogy.  The novel was good but flawed, and probably the biggest flaw was that the novel could have been so much more.

So far 'Shades of Milk and Honey' doesn't really seem like my cup of tea, but it's looking to be a pretty quick read and I should be done with it in a few days.  Also I need to finish it off because the sequel, 'Glamour in Glass' was nominated for an award this year.  I hate getting backed up on sequels, I've got a whole slew of Jack McDevitt novels I need to read stretching back to 1999.  The worst part is that the first few novels in those McDevitt series just aren't all that interesting, but no one can shut up about how great the later novels are. 

Anyway, I'm not so big on Milk and Honey.  So far, I should say, I'm barely getting started.  I've never really been able to get into fiction dealing with the British Regency.  I know a lot of people really like 'Jane Eyre' or whatever but every time I read one of these books I just end up asking myself, 'What the hell did they do for a living?'  None of these people seem to have jobs or anything.  There's plenty of fiction that deals with settings in which women are much more subjugated, more prevalent racism, and worse aristocracy than Regency Britain, but none of those settings are quite as celebrated and gloried over as this one, and it kind of creeps me out.

Like I said I've still got a long way to go.  Maybe I'll change my mind about Milk and Honey.  And I'll try to get a review for Crescent Moon up pretty soon.

My review of 'Kiln People' by David Brin is right below this post, and I need to say it contains some pretty big spoilers.  I've tried to keep my reviews open to whatever I think is important to note about a novel, and I've tried to keep my posts pretty general and not delve too deep into the specifics of a novel.  The problem is they're all posted right here, one after the other.  So if you don't want to know any secrets about 'Kiln People' don't scroll any further down. 

I stumbled across Kiln not knowing anything at all about it, and I've got to say it's an interesting way to approach the book.  There's some problems there for sure, but overall it's a really fun read.  Though I would say to read 'Earth' first, Brin's novel from the early nineties.  There are some similarities between the two and I think it would be important to read that other novel before starting Kiln.

I've moved on to reading 'Throne of the Crescent Moon' by Saladin Ahmed.  I feel like I need to read all the nominees for his year before I can complain about 'Caliban's War' not being nominated for anything.  So, it looks like if I want to complain about any sort of award snubs I need to get to reading.  Prepare yourself for all sorts of complaints here in like six weeks, so long as I don't end up thinking all these books are better than Caliban.  We'll see.